This Is the Crazy Story of Gideon Kipkurui Rono, the Gen Z Who Led the Fuliza Gang Behind the KSh449 Million Scandal and Bought Cars While Claiming to Be Farmers

In 2020, life was difficult for millions of Kenyans. The COVID-19 pandemic had disrupted almost everything. 

Businesses were closing, jobs were disappearing and movement restrictions and curfews had made ordinary life even harder. While many families were struggling to put food on the table, however, a very different story was allegedly unfolding in Bomet County.

At the centre of that story was a young man named Gideon Kipkurui Rono, popularly known as Giddy.

According to investigations later presented in court, Rono was a university student who became the central figure in a sophisticated operation involving SIM cards, mobile loans, bank accounts and millions of shillings. 

What started with a few SIM cards allegedly grew into a large network that investigators said had registered more than 19,000 SIM cards using identification details belonging to unsuspecting members of the public.

The story began in July 2020.

On July 20, Rono allegedly obtained a substantial amount of money and, the following day, walked into Nakuru Equipment Supplies carrying KSh143,000 in cash. He used the money to purchase a Bajaj Boxer motorcycle, registration number KMFZ526E.

For an ordinary Kenyan, buying a motorcycle could mean starting a boda boda business, carrying passengers, transporting goods and building a source of income. But investigators later linked Rono's motorcycle purchases to money they alleged had come from the wider Fuliza scheme.

Barely two months later, on September 2, 2020, he reportedly returned to buy another motorcycle, paying KSh90,000 in cash.

At that point, what looked like a young man enjoying sudden financial success was allegedly something much bigger.

The trick, according to the investigations, involved lost identification documents and newly registered SIM cards.

Rono allegedly searched for lost identity cards in Bomet and used them to register mobile phone lines through Safaricom MobiGo machines. The investigators' case was that the identities belonged to unsuspecting Kenyans, meaning the people whose details were being used were not necessarily aware that new SIM cards were being registered in their names.

The operation became more attractive because one identity document could reportedly be used to register several SIM cards. The new lines were then allegedly used to access Fuliza loans.

The basic idea was simple but, according to investigators, could be repeated on a huge scale.

A SIM card would be registered, activated and used to access a Fuliza loan. The money would then allegedly be moved to numbers controlled by the gang. Once the SIM had served its purpose, it could be discarded and replaced with another one.

That meant the operation could continue almost like an assembly line.

One SIM.

One loan.

One transfer.

Then another SIM.

Then another loan.

And another transfer.

What appeared to be small amounts of money on individual transactions could therefore become millions when repeated thousands of times.

But Rono soon needed more SIM cards and more people.

That is where the operation allegedly expanded beyond one person.

According to the investigations, Rono brought in several associates. Among the people later named in the court proceedings were Kipkemoi Isac, Edwin Kipkorir Cheruiyot, Nelson Kamau Njoroge, Gidion Kibet Koech, Jonnes Kipkurui Cheruiyot and Gedion Kipkoech Kirui. They were respondents alongside Rono in the Assets Recovery Agency proceedings.

One of the people allegedly connected to the operation was Isaac Kipkemoi, who was a university student at the time. Another associate, Nelson Kamau Njoroge, was described in the investigations as having expertise in SIM swapping.

The network allegedly became even more sophisticated after Rono was connected to Peter Gitahi, an IT specialist based in Trans Nzoia.

Investigators alleged that Gitahi had access to systems and equipment that enabled the production of falsified identity documents. The operation reportedly used multiple MobiGo machines to register large numbers of SIM cards, which were then supplied to Rono and his associates.

This changed everything.

Rono no longer had to depend only on finding lost IDs.

The gang could allegedly obtain large numbers of SIM cards and use them for the same purpose.

The operation then moved from Bomet to Nakuru.

Rono and some of his associates allegedly rented an apartment in Kiamunyi Estate, which investigators later identified as an operational base. From there, the group allegedly coordinated the registration and use of SIM cards on a much larger scale.

By early 2021, the money trail had become impossible to ignore.

On February 5, 2021, Rono opened an account at Family Bank's Nakuru branch with only KSh1,000. For the first few weeks, the account remained largely inactive.

Then something changed.

From February 22, investigators said the account began receiving numerous deposits through mobile money transfers. Some transactions ranged from KSh22,000 to KSh100,000, and the account was reportedly receiving as many as 90 transactions in a single day.

The money was allegedly coming from numerous M-PESA numbers.

This was one of the patterns that later attracted investigators' attention.

The operation allegedly responded by spreading the money across more accounts.

On March 23, 2021, Nelson Kamau and Edwin reportedly opened Family Bank accounts. Isaac later opened another account, with investigators alleging that his account received hundreds of deposits.

The movement of money became increasingly complicated. Cash was allegedly transferred between mobile wallets, bank accounts and M-PESA agent outlets. 

According to evidence cited in the High Court proceedings, Rono's Family Bank account received more than KSh3.14 billion through thousands of mobile money transactions during the period examined by investigators, while more than KSh3.14 billion was transferred onward to thousands of M-PESA agent outlets. The court records treated these transactions as part of the financial trail under investigation.

This is where the story becomes even more extraordinary.

The alleged operation was no longer simply about borrowing money through individual mobile lines.

It had developed into a sophisticated financial network involving thousands of phone numbers and multiple accounts.

And the money was allegedly being converted into a lifestyle.

On July 7, 2021, Rono opened a Co-operative Bank account with KSh7,500. Investigators later identified substantial deposits flowing through the account.

By August, the young man who had started with motorcycles was allegedly ready for a much bigger purchase.

He acquired a Subaru Forester.

Soon, other members of the group were also buying vehicles.

Isaac Kipkemoi travelled to Mombasa with Rono, and investigators linked the trip to the purchase of a Toyota Mark X. Court documents later listed a Toyota Mark X registration number KDD 559P among the vehicles whose ownership was challenged by the Assets Recovery Agency.

Nelson Kamau was also linked to a Subaru Forester, registration number KDG 972S.

Edwin Kipkorir Cheruiyot was linked to another Subaru Forester, registration number KDG 061R.

Jonnes Kipkurui Cheruiyot was linked to a Subaru Impreza, registration number KDG 899M.

Another vehicle, a Subaru Forester registration number KDD 060A, was registered in Rono's name.

The list did not stop with cars.

Several motorcycles were also identified in the recovery proceedings, including the Bajaj Boxer that Rono had purchased at the beginning of the story.

To outsiders, the sudden appearance of expensive cars and motorcycles may have looked like the success of ambitious young businessmen.

The court record shows that Rono himself later defended some of the assets by saying they had been acquired through legitimate sources.

In his replying affidavit, he said he and his father operated a petrol station in Bomet and that he also had a farming business. He claimed that the farming enterprise generated KSh2 million in gross income in 2020 and that he used proceeds from the farm to purchase motorcycles.

That explanation became one of the striking elements of the case.

While investigators were following a trail of mobile-money transactions, bank deposits and SIM cards, the respondents maintained that some of the wealth had legitimate explanations.

But investigators were not convinced.

Their findings pointed to an enormous number of SIM cards.

The Assets Recovery Agency told the court that the group had operated a network that illegally registered more than 19,000 SIM cards using identity details belonging to unsuspecting members of the public. The SIM cards were allegedly used to obtain loans through Fuliza, after which the money was moved through other numbers and eventually into bank accounts or mobile wallets associated with the respondents.

And then came the red flags.

The repeated activation of SIM cards, the borrowing patterns and the rapid movement of funds allegedly created a trail that could not remain hidden forever.

Investigators began following the money.

They examined bank accounts.

They traced M-PESA wallets.

They looked at phone numbers.

They investigated the movement of cash.

Slowly, the network began to emerge.

By 2023, authorities had escalated the matter.

The Assets Recovery Agency said it opened an inquiry after receiving information about suspected complex theft involving the Fuliza digital borrowing platform operated by NCBA Bank. The agency obtained warrants relating to bank accounts, M-PESA wallets and Safaricom-related records as it investigated the suspected scheme.

The investigation eventually led to preservation proceedings.

On September 12, 2023, preservation orders were obtained in proceedings involving Rono and other respondents, with the orders subsequently published in the Kenya Gazette.

The alleged financial loss associated with the wider scheme was placed at approximately KSh449.6 million in reports surrounding the criminal case.

In February 2023, the suspects were arrested and taken through the court process, according to reports on the case. The criminal allegations remained subject to due process, meaning that being charged did not by itself amount to a conviction.

But the story did not end with the arrests.

The government also wanted to know what had happened to the assets allegedly purchased with the proceeds.

That question led to a separate asset recovery case.

The Assets Recovery Agency went after the cars and motorcycles.

The agency argued that the vehicles and motorcycles were proceeds of crime and should therefore be forfeited to the government.

The respondents fought the application.

Rono, for example, maintained that some of his property had been purchased using money from farming and other legitimate businesses.

But on October 31, 2024, the High Court in Nairobi allowed the Assets Recovery Agency's application. Justice P.J.O. Otieno declared the listed vehicles and motorcycles proceeds of crime and ordered their forfeiture to the Government of Kenya.

Among the vehicles affected was Rono's Subaru Forester KDD 060A.

The Toyota Mark X KDD 559P associated with Isaac Kipkemoi was also included, as were vehicles linked to Nelson Kamau, Edwin Kipkorir, Jonnes Kipkurui and Gidion Kibet. Several motorcycles were also included in the forfeiture orders.

The court's reasoning was clear: proceeds of crime should not remain in the hands of people who are found, through the asset recovery process, to have acquired them from unlawful conduct.

In effect, the flashy lifestyle that had once appeared to represent success became part of the evidence authorities used to trace the alleged proceeds.

The motorcycles.

The Subarus.

The Mark X.

The bank accounts.

The mobile wallets.

Everything formed part of a much larger financial picture.

What makes the story particularly striking is how ordinary the beginning appeared.

A university student.

A motorcycle.

A few SIM cards.

Small loans.

Then more SIM cards.

More loans.

More bank accounts.

More money.

Then expensive cars.

What investigators uncovered was allegedly a network that had transformed the misuse of personal identification details and mobile lending facilities into a large-scale operation.

The KSh449.6 million figure makes the case one of the most striking mobile-finance fraud stories associated with Kenya's Fuliza platform.

But there is another lesson hidden inside the story.

The case shows how quickly technology can be turned against the very systems designed to make life easier. Mobile lending was created to give people quick access to emergency money. SIM cards made communication and financial transactions simple. M-PESA made it possible to move money instantly.

Yet investigators alleged that the same convenience was exploited on a massive scale.

For the unsuspecting Kenyans whose identity details were allegedly used, the story was not about soft life or expensive cars. Their personal information had allegedly become part of a financial operation without their knowledge.

For Rono and his associates, the alleged operation appeared to produce extraordinary wealth for a period.

But the trail eventually caught up with them.

The cars that symbolised the good life became subject to recovery proceedings.

The bank accounts became part of an investigation.

The SIM cards became evidence.

And the money trail that once seemed impossible to follow ultimately became the road that led investigators back to the people allegedly behind the operation.

The High Court's October 2024 judgment marked a major development because the assets identified in the case were ordered forfeited to the Government of Kenya.

So, the story of Gideon Kipkurui Rono is not simply a story about a young man who suddenly started driving expensive cars.

It is a story about how an alleged digital scheme grew from a handful of SIM cards into a network involving thousands of identities, mobile loans, bank accounts and hundreds of millions of shillings.

And perhaps the most dramatic part is that the people allegedly running the operation did not need a traditional bank vault, armed robbery or dramatic getaway.

They allegedly used phones, SIM cards, identification details and digital financial systems.

For a while, the money moved quietly.

Then the cars arrived.

The motorcycles arrived.

The lifestyle became visible.

And eventually, investigators followed the money all the way back to its alleged source.

The legal proceedings, however, remain important to the story. The asset recovery case resulted in forfeiture orders, but allegations in the separate criminal proceedings must still be distinguished from a criminal conviction unless and until a court determines guilt. 

The High Court judgment itself dealt with recovery of assets under proceeds-of-crime law and identified the respondents and the property subject to forfeiture.

What began during the difficult days of the COVID-19 pandemic therefore became a case study in the dangers of identity misuse, digital financial fraud and the speed at which small transactions can become a multimillion-shilling operation.

From a KSh143,000 motorcycle purchase to Subarus, a Mark X and a network of thousands of SIM cards, the alleged Fuliza operation became far bigger than anyone looking at the first few transactions could have imagined.

And when the investigators finally arrived, the soft life had a very different ending.

Post a Comment

Previous Post Next Post